Monday 26 January 2015

Question 2: Narrative (practice essay)


Narrative

The traditional type of narrative for our genre of action is linear. This is evident in film openings for our genre that inspired us.  This means starting at the beginning, moving to the middle and proceeding to the end of the story. Levi Strauss’ theory that says binary opposites are important in narratives such as good vs evil, women vs men, crime vs justice can be applied to our film opening as we had a good vs evil theme.

Regarding camera work in our AS film opening, we used a variety of shots to communicate the narrative of our film opening. This included close ups of the main character so people could identify with her and wide shots of both the good girl and bad guys, to show them at opposite ends of the camera and therefore opposite ends of the spectrum. These wide shots enabled us to show that the unique casting of a lead female in an action genre with a sci-fi feel was being chased by two male special agents. The theory proposed by Levi Strauss about binary opposites being just as important as narrative can be applied here, as without the idea of good vs evil we would have had no narrative to incorporate.

In terms of editing in our AS film opening, we used short cut shots and a variety of transitions to communicate the narrative of our film opening. The use of short cut shots coincided with the build up of fast paced music – all to create the effect of tension and drama that is typical of our genre. We used transitions such as fades and dip to blacks to make the narrative of good vs bad (Strauss) seem like the most important factor, agreeing with his theory.

For sound, we chose a song that built up really dramatically and when it reached its’ peak, became very fast paced to match the narrative of the genre. This made our sequence successful, as we were able to use sound to help incorporate Propp’s theory that texts need particular characters to develop a narrative. Also, that there are particular parts of a narrative that always happen, for example in our film opening – the good girl was being chased by the bad guys. The audience enjoys watching this and it gives them someone to identify with and also root for, which makes them more focused and interested in the narrative. The music aided this because as it built up, it was more evident that the particular part of the narrative was needed, supporting Propp’s theory.

For mise en scene, we used real costumes such as the special agents in suits with ear pieces and the female hacker in a black dress with boots and a coat to add a sense of realism. For locations, we filmed in train stations so that it was busy and added a sense of panic to the narrative. Also, we filmed in old cobbled streets so that it wasn’t busy to show a sense of loneliness and helplessness to the character in need of a way out. Mise en scene helped communicate the narrative as all of the above factors made the characters perform in a more successful way and therefore the storyline was more tight packed and Propp’s theory of needing something to happen highlighted the use of mise en scene.

We used narrative enigma, theses are codes that limit the audience to information, and it lets them have to figure what is going off in the story. This was evident when we opened with the hacker sitting typing on her laptop, and the special agents see her and mouth something into their ear pieces. This creates questions such as, who is she? Who are they? What has she done? Why do they want to follow her? This then creates an enigma so that our audience are pleased and will continue to watch.

To conclude, our audience viewers thought that our narrative was interesting and unique, as we used a female lead in an action genre with a sci-fi feel. This is not normally expected of this type of genre, therefore it was seen as cleverer and therefore interesting. Our genre was action which was highly noticeable with the help of factors such as editing, sound, mise en scene and the type of camera shots. Perhaps if we used more of an unrestricted narration, where information is given out in as much detail as possible with very little restrictions so the “narrative” is clear like an unknown theorist proposed, we could have made it even more unique and perhaps targeted an even wider audience – but that is the only thing that would have potentially made it better.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment